After watching the movie One Flew
Over The Cuckoo's Nest I
realized that while reading the novel, I had interpreted the
characters and main conflicts much differently than the director of
the movie. I also realized that the visuals one receives while
reading about a character are much less judgemental appearance wise
of those we receive when watching the movie. As I was reading the
book I realized that the patients in the ward weren't really that
crazy at all. The characteristics given by Bromden were very
descriptive and even so, I only received a few notifications that the
people were insane. Contrary to the film, at first glance of the
characters they seemed completely out of their minds. In my opinion,
the director intensified the patients personalities rendering the
movie much more dramatic and interesting. Something I noticed
throughout the film was the humour and the fact that it was fun to
watch. The content in the movie was taken much more lightly, contrary
to the novel. The director of the film had a different purpose, to
entertain the viewer, he did so by completely changing the atmosphere
of dark and institutional to a typical insane asylum with a humorous
twist. For example, while reading the novel we look at the patients
as the nurses subjects and that she owns them, where as in the film
they seem much less afraid of her. I noticed many changes in how
conflicts were shown in the movie but they never changed the
significance of the story or theme itself therefore there is no real
need to talk about them.
No comments:
Post a Comment